Variant 10: conflict of interest? of Massimiliano Floriani
Press of Italy Posted on Arco values \u200b\u200b
in part on the Trentino Alto Adige and of December 11, 2009
now go back on the controversial issue of the new variant to that variant PGR 10, ex Tourist variant. In an article in the local newspapers last week, the President of the Planning Commission of the City of Arco, arch. Roberto Bresciani, cleared in a hurry so dry and the concerns of citizens and political leaders-not only extra-Italy of Values \u200b\u200bBoard as well as many advisers majority-describes as "discussions (often sterile) on method or other similar amenities. ". So some have noted, especially on the method, are perceived as pleasant by Bresciani, that is funny, but there's really nothing to laugh about. In fact, with regard to transparency and method, which is why yours truly has already expressed some opposition Italy of Values \u200b\u200bin the name of the variant 10, there are no such details. Just do a quick search on external consultancy entrusted to the architect. MP to understand immediately that something is wrong. From the results in No. 327, 26/09/2008 issued by the then Manager of Technical Campostrini Louis shows that the selection of the architect was made under powers provided by the curriculum deposited in the municipality. But in the Guidelines for the award of consultancies, study, research and collaboration made by the Secretary Municipal states that "the measure must give credit assignment of the reasons that led to the identification of the subject indicated," but this is not explained in the results. So how does any citizen to know if the curriculum is not downloaded from the website of the municipality as determined in question? Is there anything that you do not need to know? In fact in the curriculum (which you can have with a formal request filed jointly because the file) there is no hint that the young architect has never worked on a variant of a Master Plan before the previous task entrusted to him for ever by Campostrini variant 8. The questions at this point can be manifold. Starting with the assumption that it is good to give an assignment to a young man who recently exercised in technical, I still wonder why the architect had two opinions from the town of Arco in a single year (ie, a variation on the 8 and one on 10). You are not required for rotation of the advice? Of course this is not something found only in our town, across the province are case studies of many architects, including young people, who for years have submitted your resume in common but have never been contacted. That we need a little push? To give further support to this argument is enough to request the curriculum of the aforementioned architect also submitted to the municipality of Vezzano, where since October 2005 has been a member of the Building Committee. Strangely to Vezzano, although prior to that of Arc, is two pages. It just happens to appear in the Arc we wanted to just omit the part about his continuing collaboration with its January 2006 by the architect. Roberto Bresciani. Also on the first page of the municipality deposited in Arco address the technical study has shown the same dwelling with the sheer number of mobile phone, while in the randomly deposited in Vezzano address of the study is the same as that of Bresciani , engraved with their telephone numbers and fax numbers of the study site in Via Santa Caterina. But we If there is more collaboration between the two architects, because then, I wonder, it was decided to omit it from the curriculum of Arc? Also if you notice the list of equipment that comes with the office of architect MP, at the end of both the curriculum, you will immediately sense that no one person needs five Pentium 4 PC graphics station. This is because obviously refers to the equipment made available to it by other studies. The problem is that there is no reference to be part of a group practice. The question then arises spontaneously. Who has given the name of the MP as an external consultant for Variant 8:10? In light of these facts, believes that Italy of Values \u200b\u200band little serious transparent, we ask that the city council discuss and that measures are taken soon. In conclusion, we hope that as important posts the Presidency of the Planning Commission and Planning Department are never the most reliable designers working with a private practice in the municipal area. Breslin wrote at the end of his article, "this is the only truth about variant 10": and what are these facts?
